Wednesday 26 April 2017


Corporal punishment horror 

An image of a teacher administering corporal punishment to a pupil (Shutterstock) 


Schools are meant to be the one of the safest places where pupils fulfil their educational practices. However many studies show that corporal punishment is adopted worldwide in many schools.

Corporal punishment was abolished in 1997 in our basic education system but 20 years later schools still rely on it as a form of a disciplinary measure against pupils who engage in various misconducts. It is widely believed that discipline is required for students in order for them to be successful in education, especially during the compulsory education period. Rosen (1997)

The latest victim to this phenomenon is Sphamandla Choma, the 14 year old boy from Middelburg Mpumalanga, was left paralysed and a few months later died from his injuries after being allegedly assaulted by his school principal.

Earlier this year Sowetan Live reported that the boy was left paralysed after being assaulted by his school principal for stealing R150, 00 from the teacher’s bag.

Speaking to Michelle Craig of eNCA, spokesperson of the Mpumalanga department of education Jasper Zwane voiced out his disapproval of the practice and encouraged pupils and parents to report incidences to the department and the police.

Pupils raising their hands in class to respond or get the teachers attention (Shutterstock)


The principal has been charged with misconduct for allegedly assaulting Sphamandla but the issue could prove to be more intricate if indeed the boy died as a result of the injuries that he sustained as a result of the assault. The worst scenario for the principal would be a murder charge against him.

In line with the Constitution, the National Education Policy Act of 1996 (Republic of South Africa, 1996a: A-47) states that “no person shall administer corporal punishment or subject a student to psychological or physical abuse at any educational institution”. Schools have to come up with functional alternative measures in order to deal with indiscipline.

The dilemma in this issue is how do school teachers instil discipline without infringing on the rights of pupils and avoid trampling on the constitution? Government introduced the Alternatives to corporal punishment document as a way to deal with the conundrum.

Alternatives to corporal punishment as contained in the document are: 




  • Give praise – Reward pupils for positive behaviour.

  • Lead by example – Project a type of conduct that you expect from the pupils.

  • Be realistic – Don’t just want to instil discipline even on circumstances that require compassion and understanding.

  • Restorative Justice – The use of disciplinary techniques that will discourage other pupils from misbehaving.

  • Don’t threaten or shout at children.

  • Be respectful – If you respect your pupils it is likely that they will do the same.

  • Use ‘good’ words to describe children – Child naming cultivates bad behaviour.

  • Use guidance and counselling methods – Explain to the pupils what kind of conduct is expected from them.


The growing number of corporal punishment incidences depicts that the alternatives to corporal punishment document is not working, perhaps new legislature should be introduced. 









No comments:

Post a Comment